Full text
Paul G. CHESSHER, Petitioner, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Respondent

Loading…
Opinion
27 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 29 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1983
Full text
Paul G. CHESSHER, Petitioner, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Respondent
Citations
Cited by
Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth) · May 15, 2025
Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth) · Apr 17, 2025
Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston) · Jul 11, 2024
Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth) · Jun 13, 2024
Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston) · Feb 22, 2024
Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston) · Jun 22, 2023
Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist. · Mar 30, 2023
Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas) · Dec 30, 2022
Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco) · Oct 19, 2022
Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth) · Jul 21, 2022
Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana) · Apr 22, 2022
Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston) · Mar 8, 2022
Parentheticals
holding that trial court erred by granting party summary judgment on multiple claims where party only moved for summary judgment on one claim
holding appellate court’s affirmation of judgment disposing of all the plaintiff’s claims was improper when the defendant had moved for summary judgment on only one of the plaintiff’s claims
holding appellate court’s affirmation of judgment disposing of all the plaintiff’s claims was improper when the defendant had moved for summary judgment on only one of the plaintiff’s claims
Rosanna Barrera, Sage Barrera, and Jenesey Barrera v. Dean T. Cherer & Chererco, LLC
reversing and remanding case in which summary judgment was granted on only one of the plaintiff’s four causes of action
stating it is reversible error to grant summary judgment on a claim not addressed in the motion
reversing a summary judgment rendered as to four causes of action when the movant moved for summary judgment on only one of the causes of action
summary judgment cannot be granted as a matter of law on cause of action not addressed in summary-judgment proceeding
one may not be granted judgment as a matter of law on a cause of action not addressed in a summary judgment proceeding
because motion for summary judgment challenged only one of four pleaded causes of action, take-nothing judgment on the three unchallenged causes was improper
"It is axiomatic that one may not be granted judgment as a matter of law on a cause of action not addressed in a summary judgment proceeding."
Exxon Mobil Chemical Company, a Division of ExxonMobil Corporation v. Robert F. Ford, Jr.
“It is axiomatic that one may not be granted judgment as a matter of law on a cause of action not addressed in a summary judgment proceeding.”
defense to only one of four causes of action addressed in summary judgment motion