United States v. Keegan Van Tuyl

MEMORANDUM ** Keegan C. Van Tuyl appeals from the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand. Van Tuyl’s sole contention is that the supervised release condition prohibiting association with Neo-Nazi/white supremacist affiliates is unconstitutionally over-broad. The government agrees that the judgment should be changed to explicitly reflect that the condition prohibits association -with known neo-Nazi/white supremacist affiliates. Under these circumstances, we vacate the challenged condition and remand for the district court to re-sentence in a manner consistent with this opinion. See, e.g, United States v. Ross, 476 F.3d 719 (9th Cir.2007). The sentence is affirmed in all other respects. VACATED in part; AFFIRMED in part; and REMANDED. Footnotes [**] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.