Full text
Rustic Village, Inc. v. Friedman

Loading…
Opinion
417 So. 2d 305 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 27, 1982
Full text
Rustic Village, Inc. v. Friedman
Metadata
Citations
Cited by
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 18, 2025
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 24, 2016
Eleventh Circuit · Nov 17, 2015
Supreme Court of Florida · Jan 10, 2013
Eleventh Circuit · Jul 7, 2011
Eleventh Circuit · Jul 7, 2011
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 14, 2007
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 18, 2001
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 5, 1997
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 26, 1996
Eleventh Circuit · Aug 30, 1994
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 15, 1994
Parentheticals
stating that upon a trial court’s finding that a plaintiff filed a claim under FDUTPA, an award of attorney’s fees to a prevailing defendant is permissible in the action, even if the trial court ultimately holds that FDUTPA does not apply
relying on Rustic Village in describing MGB’s argument as “heads I win, tails you lose.”
affirming fee award where defendant prevailed outright and the plaintiff recovered nothing
Rachel Stevick Quires v. Copperstone Equestrian Center, LLC and Donna M. Dubois
"The plaintiff, having invoked the Act, is liable for an attorney’s fee because he did not prevail."
“The plaintiff, having invoked the Act, is liable for an attorney’s fee because he did not prevail.”
defendant was entitled to attorney's fees under Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act after it was determined that plaintiff's claim was not covered by the Act
“[Wjhere a plaintiff brings a claim under the Act, an attorney’s fee is to be allowed a prevailing defendant even though the trial judge holds that the action is not one contemplated by the Act.”
“[W]here a plaintiff brings a claim under the Act, an attorney’s fee is to be allowed a prevailing defendant even though the trial judge holds that the action is not one contemplated by the Act.”