Powell v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

727 So. 2d 1103 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 10, 1999

Full text

727 So.2d 1103 (1999) Gary POWELL, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Florida Parole Commission, Respondents. No. 99-318. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. March 10, 1999. Gary Powell, pro se, petitioner. No appearance for respondents. PER CURIAM. Gary Powell petitions this court for a belated appeal of orders denying his petition for writ of mandamus/habeas corpus. Because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j) are not applicable. We therefore deny the petition, but do so without prejudice to Powell's right to seek relief in the trial court. See Brown v. State, 708 So.2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Snelson v. Snelson, 440 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). ERVIN, BOOTH, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Parentheticals

holding that where the proceedings below are civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate procedure 9.141 are not applicable
Blaxton v. ESCAMBIA SHERIFF'S OFFICE
holding that where the proceedings below are civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141 are not applicable
Smith v. State
holding that a motion for belated appeal in a criminal proceeding, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j) (currently Rule 9.141(c)
Sumler v. State
stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j) (now rule 9.141(c)) are not applicable
Joseph Yakymiw v. Brittni Huguet
stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable
Johnny Welch v. Department of Corrections
stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j), now rule 9.141(c), are not applicable
Ava Electris Cannie, Eva Electris Cannie, and Eva Helene Cannie v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB etc.
stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable
Mark A. Merrill v. State of Florida, Mark S. Inch, Florida Department of Corrections
stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable
Robert Michael Ardis v. Sarah Ardis
stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable
Woodson v. State
stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable
McCutcheon v. Florida Parole Commission
stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable
Chestnut v. Florida Department of Corrections
stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.l40(j) (now rule 9.141(c)) are not applicable
Yakymiw v. Huguet