Bucklew v. Luebbers

Parentheticals

• finding similar contention trial court’s exclusion of evidence violated constitutional right to present meaningful defense not preserved for appellate review when offer of proof not made

  David Wayne Caffery v. State

• finding similar contention trial court’s exclusion of evidence violated constitutional right to present meaningful defense not preserved for appellate review when offer of proof not made

  in the Interest of B.L.M. and C.D.M., Children

• finding similar contention trial court's exclusion of evidence violated constitutional right to present meaningful defense not preserved for appellate review when offer of proof not made

  Ruben Isreal Sanchez v. State

• finding similar contention trial court’s exclusion of evidence violated constitutional right to present meaningful defense not preserved for appellate review when offer of proof not made

  Ruben Isreal Sanchez v. State

• applying the abuse of discretion standard to review of a factually similar circumstance

  State v. Funrue

• for evidence to be admissible under OEC 404(3), its logical relevance must not depend on “an inference relating to the defendant’s character or propensities”

  Delgado-Juarez v. Cain

• defendant’s complaints about counsel did not necessitate substitution of counsel because they concerned strategic decisions that were counsel’s to make

  State v. Vierria

• setting not compelling, partly because defendant exercised control over interrogation

  State v. Turnidge

• “[I]f evidence of prior crimes is to be admitted to prove identity based on modus operandi, the trial court must find a very high degree of similarity between the charged and uncharged crimes, as well as a methodology that is highly distinctive.”

  State v. Taylor