Loading…
Opinion
166 L. Ed. 2d 722 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 8, 2007
Full text
Cochran v. Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals · May 25, 2017
Supreme Court of Florida · Sep 27, 2012
Supreme Court of Virginia · Jan 13, 2012
Fourth Circuit · Apr 29, 2011
Fourth Circuit · Apr 25, 2011
Parentheticals
stating that once case proceeds to trial, question of whether trial court erred in denying motion to suppress is no longer viable and defendant's only available argument is whether trial court erred in admitting evidence at trial
stating that once case proceeds to trial, question of whether trial court erred in denying motion to suppress is no longer viable and defendant’s only available argument is whether trial court erred in admitting evidence at trial
where despite the defendants' claim that two important witnesses were lost, one of whom they claimed had died, the Court found the defendants failed to show specific prejudice from the delay absent details as to why those witnesses were material
where despite the defendants' claim that they had lost two important witnesses, one of whom they claimed had died, the Court found the defendants failed to show specific prejudice from the delay absent details as to why those witnesses were material
