Loading…

Kroeze v. Scott — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Kroeze v. Scott

752 N.W.2d 34 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · Mar 14, 2008

Full text

Kroeze v. Scott

752 N.W.2d 34 (2008) KROEZE v. SCOTT. No. 07-0995. Court of Appeals of Iowa. March 14, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 1873036

Citations

752 N.W.2d 34
2008 WL 680748

Cited by

Ryan Lutze v. Tony L. Seitz and Rebecca A. Seitz
Court of Appeals of Iowa · Feb 11, 2026
Harper v. City of Keswick
Court of Appeals of Iowa · Jun 7, 2023

Parentheticals

concluding an easement by necessity was not shown because the plaintiﬀs “have access by foot or tractor to their property”
Ryan Lutze v. Tony L. Seitz and Rebecca A. Seitz
finding the actions of the defendants and their predecessors supported a claim of adverse possession
Harper v. City of Keswick

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service