Opinion

State v. Howell

752 N.W.2d 34 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · Mar 26, 2008

Full text

State v. Howell

752 N.W.2d 34 (2008) STATE v. HOWELL. No. 07-1179. Court of Appeals of Iowa. March 26, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Citations

Cited by

Parentheticals

holding the defendant did not preserve his right to challenge to his written guilty plea but still finding substantial compliance with rule 2.8(2)(b)(2) because court’s errors in written plea were harmless
State of Iowa v. Walter Scott Sutton
“We are aware of no rule that 5 requires the defendant to be informed of the time limit for filing a motion in arrest of judgment. We find there was substantial compliance with rule 2.8(2)(d
State of Iowa v. Kenneth Wesley Pappas