Keen v. FLORIDA SHERIFFS'SELF-INSURANCE FUND

854 So.2d 844 (2003) Angela Hamilton KEEN, Appellant, v. FLORIDA SHERIFFS' SELF-INSURANCE FUND, Appellee. No. 4D02-3857. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. September 24, 2003. *845 Eric G. Belsky of Johnson, Leiter & Belsky, Fort Lauderdale and Eric H. Luckman of Eric H. Luckman, P.A., Boynton Beach, for appellant. Ellen C. Pappas and Ronald A. Mowrey of Mowrey & Biggins, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellee. PER CURIAM. We reverse the order dismissing this action seeking a declaration of coverage under an insurance policy. The court made a decision on the merits that there was no coverage under the policy. This was error. "A motion to dismiss a complaint for declaratory judgment is not a motion on the merits. Rather, it is a motion only to determine whether the plaintiff is entitled to a declaration of its rights, not to whether it is entitled to a declaration in its favor." Laganella v. Boca Grove Golf & Tennis Club, Inc., 690 So.2d 705, 706 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (quoting Royal Selections, Inc. v. Fla. Dep't of Revenue, 687 So.2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)). Appellee relied heavily on Mason v. Florida Sheriffs' Self-Insurance Fund, 699 So.2d 268 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), which construed the same policy language under very similar circumstances. However, Mason was not a declaratory judgment case and therefore is not applicable to this procedural matter, although it is relevant authority on the merits. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. WARNER, MAY, JJ., and ARAMONY, SUSAN, Associate Judge, concur.