Com. v. Jaynes

Parentheticals

• describing Commw. of Pa. v. Chance, 312 Pa.Super. 435, 458 A.2d 1371 (1983

  Gorman v. Bail

• treating appellant’s pro se motion challenging his guilty plea as a PCRA petition “regardless of the manner in which the petition is titled”; concluding appellant was entitled to counsel on his first PCRA petition

  Com. v. Stewart, L.

• treating appellant’s pro se motion challenging his guilty plea as a PCRA petition “regardless of the manner in which the petition is titled”; concluding appellant was entitled (Footnote Continued) S. Ct. 2695 (U.S. 2014

  Com. v. Hrusovsky, R.