Opinion

State v. Golkiewicz

930 So. 2d 862 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 21, 2006

Full text

State v. Golkiewicz

930 So.2d 862 (2006) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Patricia GOLKIEWICZ, Appellee. No. 4D05-2703. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. June 21, 2006. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine M. Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Dea Abramschmitt, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The state challenges the circuit court's imposition of a downward departure sentence without providing written reasons or engaging in the proper analysis. We affirm *863 the sentence because the state failed to preserve the issue in the trial court. Affirmed. See State v. Dort, 929 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Per Curiam
Cluster ID: 1899415

Citations

930 So. 2d 862
2006 WL 1686450

Cited by

State v. Calvert
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 12, 2009
State v. Green
District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 6, 2009

Parentheticals

“The state challenges the circuit court’s imposition of a downward departure sentence without providing written reason» or engaging in the proper analysis. We affirm the sentence because the state failed to preserve the issue in the trial court.”
State v. Calvert
"The state challenges the circuit court's imposition of a downward departure sentence without providing written reasons or engaging in the proper analysis. We affirm the sentence because the state failed to preserve the issue in the trial court."
State v. Calvert