Opinion

State v. Orr

723 N.W.2d 453 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · Aug 23, 2006

Full text

State v. Orr

723 N.W.2d 453 (2006) STATE v. ORR. No. 05-1864. Court of Appeals of Iowa. August 23, 2006. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Citations

Cited by

Parentheticals

“A person may be found guilty under section 321J.2(1)(a) in the absence of admissible evidence from chemical tests.”
State of Iowa v. Daniel Lee White
“A person may be found guilty under section 321J.2(1)(a) in the absence of admissible evidence from chemical tests.”
State of Iowa v. Dion Caldwell
“A person may be found guilty under section 321J.2(1)(a) in the absence of admissible evidence from chemical tests.”
State of Iowa v. Curtis Lee Walter
“[E]vidence that a defendant submitted to a PBT is admissible when no reference is made to the results of the test.”
State of Iowa v. Bita Amisi
“A person may be found guilty under section 321J.2(1)(a) in the absence of admissible evidence from chemical tests.”
State of Iowa v. Mary Zarwie
“A person may be found guilty under section 321J.2(1)(a) in the absence of admissible evidence from chemical tests.”
State of Iowa v. Bridgett Denise Kuebler