Com. v. Hardy

Parentheticals

• reiterating that "[t]his Court will not act as counsel and will not develop arguments on behalf of an appellant" and may find certain issues waived if a defect in an appellate brief impedes meaningful review (citation omitted)

  Commonwealth v. Pew

• stating it is an appellant’s duty to present arguments sufficiently developed for our review and supported with references to the record and citation to legal authorities

  Com. v. Joachin, D.

• stating: “[I]t is an appellant’s duty to present arguments that are sufficiently developed for our review. The brief -8- J-A15035-20 must support the claims with pertinent discussion….”

  In the Int. of: C.J.C., Appeal of: C.J.C

• stating it is an appellant's duty to present sufficiently developed arguments for our review, including pertinent discussion and citations to legal authorities; where a brief fails to comport with this standard, we may dismiss the appeal entirely or find certain issues waived

  In Re JM

• stating it is an appellant’s duty to present sufficiently developed arguments for our review, including pertinent discussion and citations to legal authorities; where a brief fails to comport with this standard, we may dismiss the appeal entirely or find certain issues waived

  In the Interest of J.M.

• “When briefing the various issues that have been preserved, it is an appellant’s duty to present arguments that are sufficiently developed for our review.”

  Com. v. Usanga, P.

• course of conduct undertaken by investigating police officer

  Jerry v. Department of Corrections