Opinion

Huffman v. Koppers Co.

330 Md. 296 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 6, 1993

Full text

Roby HUFFMAN v. KOPPERS COMPANY, INC. Et Al.

PER CURIAM. For reasons stated by Judge Glenn T. Harrell, Jr. for the Court of Special Appeals in Huffman v. Koppers Co., 94 Md.App. 180, 616 A.2d 451 (1992), the judgment is affirmed. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED, WITH COSTS.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Submitted to Murphy
Cluster ID: 1975014

Citations

330 Md. 296
1993 Md. LEXIS 62
623 A.2d 1296

Cited by

Feiereisen v. Newpage Corp.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 14, 2010
Turner v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of Colorado
Colorado Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 2004
Barnes v. Children's Hospital
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · May 1, 1996
Mackin & Associates v. Harris
Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 11, 1996
(1996)
Maryland Attorney General Reports · Jan 17, 1996
Morris v. Board of Education
Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 22, 1995
Harris v. Mackin & Associates
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 1, 1994

Parentheticals

holding that a heart attack occurring after a deposition in a workers’ compensation case is not compensa-ble
Feiereisen v. Newpage Corp.
holding that a heart attack occurring after a deposition in a workers' compensation case is not compensable
Feiereisen v. Newpage Corp.