Opinion

Balthazar v. Mari Ltd.

396 U.S. 114 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 8, 1969

Full text

BALTHAZAR Et Ux. v. MARI LTD. Et Al.

Per Curiam. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Douglas
Cluster ID: 1998300

Citations

396 U.S. 114
90 S. Ct. 397

Cited by

Wasiluk v. City of Oneida, New York
N.D. New York · Aug 29, 2022
Continental Resources v. Fair
Nebraska Supreme Court · Mar 18, 2022
Coleman v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2014
McCann v. Scaduto
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Dec 31, 1986
Sheehan v. County of Suffolk
New York Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1986
Collector of Revenue of the City of St. Louis v. Parcels of Land Encumbered with Delinquent Tax Liens
Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1979
Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1977

Parentheticals

failure to give mail notice of tax increase barred subsequent tax lien and sale
Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10