Full text
Calero-Cerezo v. U.S. Dep of Justice

Loading…
Opinion
355 F.3d 6 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · May 14, 2004
Full text
Calero-Cerezo v. U.S. Dep of Justice
D. Puerto Rico · Feb 5, 2026
D. Puerto Rico · Jan 22, 2026
D. Utah · Jan 13, 2026
First Circuit · Jan 7, 2026
D. Massachusetts · Nov 25, 2025
D. New Hampshire · Nov 10, 2025
Parentheticals
concluding that one month was sufficient to satisfy burden of showing causal connection, but noting that three and four-month periods have been held insufficient to establish causation
holding that one-month temporal proximity was sufficient to establish causation and noting that “the prima facie burden in this context is not an onerous one”
concluding that one month was sufficient to satisfy burden of showing causal connection, but noting that three and four-month periods have been held insufficient to establish causation
noting that “[t]hree and four month periods have been held insufficient to establish a causal connection based on temporal proximity”
stating that three and four month periods have been held insufficient for purposes of establishing causality based on temporal proximity
holding that one-month period was sufficient temporal proximity for prima facie case
noting that to be adequate, requests for accommodation must be “sufficiently direct and specific, giving notice that [the employee] needs a special accommodation” (quotation marks omitted)
stating that ‘'[t]hree and four month periods have been held insufficient to establish a causal connection based on temporal proximity”
finding that a month between complaint and adverse employment action was close enough in temporal proximity to make out a prima facie case of retaliation
holding that span of one month between filing EEO complaint and being suspended was sufficient to establish prima facie claim, but noting that “[t]hree and four month periods have been held insufficient to establish a causal connection based on temporal proximity”
noting that periods of three or four months have been held insufficient to establish the necessary causal connection
stating that “[t]hree and four month periods have been held insufficient to establish a causal connection based on temporal proximity”