Loading…

Watson v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Watson v. State

976 A.2d 172 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Jul 13, 2009

Full text

Watson v. State

976 A.2d 172 (2009) WATSON v. STATE. No. 148, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware. July 13, 2009. Decision without published opinion AFFIRMED.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 2068842

Citations

976 A.2d 172
2009 WL 2006883

Cited by

State v. Dixon
Superior Court of Delaware · Sep 4, 2020
Hudson v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware · Jan 22, 2020
Hudson v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware · Jan 21, 2020
Asbury v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware · Sep 25, 2019
Walsh v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware · Mar 11, 2019

Parentheticals

appellant could not show prejudice from alleged errors of postconviction counsel because "there is no evidence that Watson's claim would have succeeded had his counsel made the argument he originally asserted in his pro se motion"
Walsh v. State

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service