Loading…

In Re Shockley — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

In Re Shockley

882 A.2d 762 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Aug 16, 2005

Full text

In Re Shockley

882 A.2d 762 (2005) IN RE SHOCKLEY. No. 182, 2005. Supreme Court of Delaware. August 16, 2005. Decision without published opinion. MANDAMUS DISMISSED.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 2081847

Citations

882 A.2d 762
2005 WL 2475731

Cited by

In the Matter of the Petition of Diamonte Taylor for a Writ of Mandamus
Supreme Court of Delaware · Dec 5, 2023
IMO Hughes
Supreme Court of Delaware · Mar 10, 2021
IMO Jonathan Johnson
Supreme Court of Delaware · Apr 15, 2020
In The Matter of Brent Harris
Supreme Court of Delaware · Apr 3, 2020
Matter of Younger
Supreme Court of Delaware · Mar 16, 2015
Matter of Tyler
Supreme Court of Delaware · Mar 6, 2015
Shockley v. Phelps
D. Delaware · Mar 10, 2011
Shockley v. Carroll
D. Delaware · Jun 13, 2007
Smith v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware · Aug 17, 2005

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Parentheticals

recognizing that a Superior Court order denying defendant’s motions to compel discovery so he could prepare a Rule 61 motion was interlocutory
In The Matter of Brent Harris
dismissing petition for a writ of mandamus seeking discovery because the petitioner had an adequate legal remedy in the postconviction proceedings and the appellate process
In The Matter of Brent Harris
denying mandamus petition because postconviction proceedings and potential appeal from those proceedings provided an adequate remedy at law
IMO Jonathan Johnson