Full text
In Re Genentech, Inc.

Loading…
Opinion
566 F.3d 1338 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jul 9, 2009
Full text
In Re Genentech, Inc.
E.D. New York · Oct 21, 2025
E.D. California · Oct 16, 2025
Fifth Circuit · Oct 10, 2025
Federal Circuit · Sep 11, 2025
E.D. Texas · May 13, 2025
S.D. New York · May 1, 2025
E.D. Texas · Mar 25, 2025
E.D. Texas · Mar 25, 2025
Parentheticals
holding that is was “clear error” for the District Court to consider this factor
Teleconference Systems v. Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
holding that when other relevant factors weigh in favor of transfer or are neu- tral, “then the speed of the transferee district court should not alone outweigh all of those other factors”
explaining that witnesses who “will be required to travel a significant distance no matter where they testify” are discounted under the 100-mile rule
explaining that a district court should “as- sess the relevance and materiality of the information the witness[es] may provide.”
indicating that the “uncertainty of 24 [plaintiff’s] personal jurisdiction” in the transferee venue is not a ground for denying transfer
noting that travel for European witnesses to California versus Texas was comparable and collecting similar cases
indicating that the “uncertainty of 24 [plaintiff’s] personal jurisdiction” in the transferee venue is not a ground for denying transfer
noting that travel for European witnesses to California versus Texas was comparable and collecting similar cases
stating that the 100-mile rule should not be “rigidly” applied in the context of foreign witnesses
stating that the 100-mile rule should not be “rigidly” applied in the context of foreign witnesses
Honeywell International Inc. v. Zebra Technologies Corporation
stating that the 100-mile rule should not be “rigidly” applied in the context of foreign witnesses
stating that the 100-mile rule should not be “rigidly” applied in the context of foreign witnesses