Loading…
Opinion
451 F.3d 1352 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jun 20, 2006
Full text
Pafford v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinions in this case
Federal Claims · Aug 22, 2025
Federal Claims · Jan 23, 2025
Federal Claims · Mar 22, 2023
Federal Claims · Feb 10, 2023
Federal Claims · Jan 31, 2022
Federal Claims · Oct 25, 2021
Federal Claims · Oct 20, 2021
Federal Claims · Aug 12, 2021
Federal Claims · Jun 29, 2021
Federal Claims · Sep 23, 2020
Federal Claims · Jun 17, 2020
Parentheticals
holding that “some evidence of temporal linkage” is required for a petitioner to demonstrate a causal link between the vaccination and injury
finding that the Special Master properly required evidence of a temporal relationship between the vaccine and petitioner’s injury
K.L. v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
stating that the three Althen prongs must "cumulatively show” that the vaccine caused the injury
finding that the Special Master properly required evidence of a temporal relationship between the vaccine and petitioner’s injury
finding that a temporal relationship is a required element of petitioner’s claim under Althen
K.L. v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
discussing a special master’s finding that it was “biologically plausible” for the vaccinations at issue to cause the injury
upholding the denial of compensation where experts did not provide sufficient evidence that a disease occurred within the medically acceptable time frame
discussing Special Master’s finding that it was “biologically plausible” for the vaccinations at issue to cause Still’s disease
“[T]he Special Master did not err in requiring specific evidence about a medically acceptable time frame linking the LinjuryJ to the vaccinations at issue.”
Doe/11 ex rel. Estate of Child/Doe/11 v. Secretary of the Dept. of Health & Human Services
petitioner must establish that a vaccination was a substantial factor and that harm would not have occurred in the absence of vaccination
petitioner must establish that a vaccination was a substantial factor and that harm would not have occurred in the absence of vaccination
petitioner must establish that a vaccination was a substantial factor and that harm would not have occurred in the absence of vaccination
