Loading…

State v. Itoh — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Itoh

784 N.W.2d 202 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · Apr 21, 2010

Full text

State v. Itoh

784 N.W.2d 202 (2010) STATE v. ITOH. No. 09-0811. Court of Appeals of Iowa. April 21, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 2120418

Citations

784 N.W.2d 202
2010 WL 1578527

Cited by

State of Iowa v. Gowun Park
Court of Appeals of Iowa · Jun 15, 2022
State of Iowa v. Roger Osborn
Court of Appeals of Iowa · Oct 10, 2018

Parentheticals

concluding the defendant was in custody when “the officers repeatedly told the defendant they already knew what happened”
State of Iowa v. Roger Osborn
“Once the defendant was told to wait, instead of being free to go, however, the circumstances weigh heavily in favor of the interrogation being custodial.”
State of Iowa v. Gowun Park

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service