Full text
Javier Arinson LANDAZURI, Petitioner-Appellant v. Keith E. HALL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee

Loading…
Opinion
423 F. App'x 475 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 28, 2011
Full text
Javier Arinson LANDAZURI, Petitioner-Appellant v. Keith E. HALL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Citations
Cited by
Fifth Circuit · Jan 8, 2025
Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · Feb 29, 2024
N.D. Texas · Jan 25, 2024
N.D. Florida · Feb 28, 2022
N.D. Texas · Feb 28, 2022
N.D. Texas · Nov 18, 2021
N.D. Texas · Dec 22, 2020
W.D. Texas · Aug 18, 2020
N.D. Texas · Jul 10, 2020
N.D. Texas · Jun 9, 2020
N.D. Texas · Jun 5, 2020
N.D. Texas · Apr 30, 2020
Parentheticals
“Because Landazuri did not file this challenge to his sentence in the court in which he was sentenced, the district court ruled correctly that it lacked jurisdiction to consider it.”
“Because Landazuri did not file this [3582(c)] challenge to his sentence in the court in which he was sentenced, the district court ruled correctly that it lacked jurisdiction to consider it”
“Because Landazuri did not file this [3582(c)] challenge to his sentence in the court in which he was sentenced, the district court ruled correctly that it lacked jurisdiction to consider it”
“Because Landazuri did not file this [3582(c)] challenge to his sentence in the court in which he was sentenced, the district court ruled correctly that it lacked jurisdiction to consider it”
“Because Landazuri did not file this [3582(c)] challenge to his sentence in the court in which he was sentenced, the district court ruled correctly that it lacked jurisdiction to consider it”
“Because Landazuri did not file this [3582(c)] challenge to his sentence in the court in which he was sentenced, the district court ruled correctly that it lacked jurisdiction to consider it”
“Because Landazuri did not file this [3582(c)] challenge to his sentence in the court in which he was sentenced, the district court ruled correctly that it lacked jurisdiction to consider it.”
“Because Landazuri did not file this [3582(c)] challenge to his sentence in the court in which he was sentenced, the district court ruled correctly that it lacked jurisdiction to consider it”
“Because Landazuri did not file this [§ 3582(c)] challenge to his sentence in the court in which he was sentenced, the district court ruled correctly that it lacked jurisdiction to consider it.”
“Because [Petitioner] did not file this [Section 3582] challenge to his sentence in the court in which he was sentenced, the district court ruled correctly that it lacked jurisdiction to consider it.”
“Because Landazuri did not file this [18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)] challenge to his sentence in the court in which he was sentenced, the district court ruled correctly that it lacked jurisdiction to consider it.” (Alteration in original).
“Because Landazuri did not file this [3582(c