Full text
RICE PARK PROPERTIES, Petitioner, v. ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI, Respondents

Loading…
Opinion
1995 Minn. LEXIS 452 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · May 31, 1995
Full text
RICE PARK PROPERTIES, Petitioner, v. ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI, Respondents
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · Mar 23, 2026
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · Feb 23, 2026
Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jan 25, 2017
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · Aug 22, 2016
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · Apr 11, 2016
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · Aug 31, 2015
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · Jan 6, 2014
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · Jul 22, 2008
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · Mar 11, 2008
Supreme Court of Minnesota · Nov 2, 2006
Supreme Court of Minnesota · Aug 23, 2001
Parentheticals
holding that the district court had the discretion to stay proceedings pending the resolution of a separate action involving the same parties and legal issue, "to avoid an unnecessary duplication of time, effort and expenditure”
“[T]he district court has considerable discretion in scheduling matters and in furthering what it has identified as the interests of judicial administration and economy.”