Tighe E. Woods, Housing Expediter v. Edward E. Garlits, Jr.

PER CURIAM. We have carefully considered the briefs, the record and the oral argument in this case and we have concluded that except in one particular the decree of the court below should ,'be affirmed. Subparagraph “2” of the third paragraph of the order is too broad in view of our decision in Woods, Housing Expediter, v. Polis, 3 Cir., 180 F.2d 4, as amended March 13, 1950. Consequently the subparagraph referred to will be stricken from the decree entered by the court below on July 18, 1949. In all other respects the decree will be affirmed.