McDaniel v. State

ORDER PER CURIAM. Bryan McDaniel appeals from the motion court’s denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the piinciples of law applicable to this case would serve no jui'-ispnidential pux-pose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their infoi-mation only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).