Loading…

Pepe v. Urban — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Pepe v. Urban

1951 N.J. LEXIS 360 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 30, 1951

Full text

Pepe v. Urban

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority

7 N.J. 80 (1951) CATHERINE PEPE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. STEVE URBAN, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. April 30, 1951. Mr. A. Leo Bohl, for the petitioner. Denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 2290348

Citations

1951 N.J. LEXIS 360
7 N.J. 80
80 A.2d 495

Cited by

Waters v. Island Transp. Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court App Division · Jan 12, 1989
Klimko v. Rose
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1980
State v. Kaiser
New Jersey Superior Court App Division · May 14, 1962
Zasada v. State
New Jersey Superior Court App Division · May 21, 1952

Parentheticals

trial judge’s failure to adjourn or grant dismissal without prejudice when plaintiff’s medical expert for damages did not appear infringed plaintiff’s substantial rights; new trial granted
Klimko v. Rose

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service