Loading…

DeSHIELDS v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

DeSHIELDS v. State

41 A.3d 429 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Mar 30, 2012

Full text

DeSHIELDS v. State

41 A.3d 429 (2012) DeSHIELDS v. STATE. No. 595, 2011. Supreme Court of Delaware. March 30, 2012. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 2299994

Citations

41 A.3d 429
2012 WL 1072298

Cited by

State v. Baker
Superior Court of Delaware · Jun 9, 2020
State v. Culp
Supreme Court of Delaware · Dec 8, 2016
Callahan v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware · Aug 22, 2016
State of Delaware v. Tollis.
Superior Court of Delaware · Jan 4, 2016
State of Delaware v. Johnson.
Superior Court of Delaware · Jun 8, 2015
Evans v. Pierce
D. Delaware · Mar 19, 2015
State of Delaware v. Weidow.
Superior Court of Delaware · Mar 11, 2015
Hewett v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware · Oct 7, 2014
State of Delaware v. Rivera.
Superior Court of Delaware · Aug 11, 2014

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Parentheticals

“This Court has held that participation in educational and rehabilitative programs, while commendable, does not, in and of itself, constitute ‘extraordinary circumstances’ for purposes of Rule 35(b).”
State of Delaware v. Rivera.
“This Court has held that participation in educational and rehabilitative programs, while commendable, does not, in and of itself, constitute ‘extraordinary circumstances’ for purposes of Rule 35(b).”
State of Delaware v. Johnson.
“This Court has held that participation in educational and rehabilitative programs, while commendable, does not, in and of itself, constitute ‘extraordinary circumstances’ for purposes of Rule 35(b).”
State of Delaware v. Tollis.
“This Court has held that participation in educational and rehabilitative programs, while commendable, does not, in and of itself, constitute “extraordinary circumstances” for purposes of Rule 35(b).”
State v. Baker