Opinion

Bell v. Kater

858 A.2d 108 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 2004

Full text

Bell v. Kater

858 A.2d 108 (2004) BELL v. KATER 96 & 97 EAL (2004) Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. September 3, 2004. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 2397211

Citations

858 A.2d 108

Cited by

Com. v. Rodland, C.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 2020
Com. v. Lucas, C.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2018
Com. v. Franklin, F.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2018
Com. v. Franklin, F.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 16, 2017
Com. v. Gonzalez, G.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 7, 2015
Commonwealth v. Salley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 2008
Stanton v. Lackawanna Energy, Ltd.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 2007

Parentheticals

stating that the trial court generally lacks jurisdiction to proceed further in a case until the appellate courts have remanded the record
Stanton v. Lackawanna Energy, Ltd.
grant of appeal nunc pro tunc was a nullity because trial court entered the order at a time when it lacked jurisdiction after appellant had commenced an appeal and before the record was remanded back to the trial court pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 2591(a)
Com. v. Rodland, C.