affirming the Superior Court’s denial of Marvel’s motion for correction of illegal sentence
Marvel v. State
affirming the Superior Court’s denial of Marvel’s motion for correction of illegal sentence
Marvel v. State
affirming denial of motion for correction of illegal sentence and stating that “the State provided sufficient support for Marvel’s status as a habitual offender and therefore his sentence is not illegal under Rule 35(a)”
Marvel v. State
whether “erroneous or not,” a term in a sentence that has no “significant current impact” on a Rule 35(a) movant doesn’t “present[] any ‘actual controversy’ ripe for consideration by this Court.”
State v. Johnson
