Lambert v. State

PER CURIAM. In this appeal, the defendant challenges the trial court’s ruling on his claims for postconviction relief and the amended sentencing order. We affirm, but remand for the entry of a corrected order of revocation that reflects a violation of only condition 5. See, e.g., Ortiz v. State, 2 So.3d 318, 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (recognizing that written order of revocation must conform to trial court’s oral pronouncement). Affirmed and Remanded. STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.