Loading…

State v. Barrow — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

State v. Barrow

366 N.C. 141 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 2012

Full text

State of North Carolina v. Chad Jarrett Barrow

PER CURIAM. As to the issue on direct appeal, we affirm. Discretionary review was improvidently allowed as to the other issues. AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Per Curiam
Cluster ID: 2509399

Citations

366 N.C. 141
2012 N.C. LEXIS 417
727 S.E.2d 546
2012 WL 2236101

Cited by

State v. Phillip J. Larscheid
Court of Appeals of Georgia · May 16, 2023
State v. Cobb
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 2020
State v. Adams
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 2017

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service