Rodgers v. State

ORDER PER CURIAM. Reginald Rodgers appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings due to abandonment by his appointed post-conviction counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).