Opinion

Greystone Mgmt. Corp. v. Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of the City of New York

477 N.Y.S.2d 315 · New York Court of Appeals · May 1, 1984

Full text

Greystone Management Corp. Et Al., Appellants, v. Conciliation and Appeals Board of the City of New York, Respondent

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in refusing to grant declaratory relief in this case (Bower & Gardner v Evans, 60 NY2d 781). Generally, a declaratory judgment action is not the proper vehicle to challenge an administrative procedure, where judicial review by way of article 78 proceeding is available. Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wacht-ler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur. Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye Concur
Cluster ID: 2583311

Citations

477 N.Y.S.2d 315
1984 N.Y. LEXIS 9011
62 N.Y.2d 763
465 N.E.2d 1251

Cited by

Horowitz v. Fallon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 14, 2022
Matter of Smith v. City of Norwich
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 7, 2022
Matter of Escalera v. Roberts
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 15, 2021
Matter of Salu v. NYS Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jan 7, 2021
Matter of Lynch v. NYS Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs