Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Costal Dry Dock & Repair Corp.

479 N.Y.S.2d 10 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1984

Full text

Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Respondent, v. Costal Dry Dock and Repair Corp., Appellant

OPINION OF THE COURT On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (97 AD2d 724). Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Cooke, Jasen, Jones, Kaye, Meyer, Simons, Wachtler
Cluster ID: 2583322

Citations

479 N.Y.S.2d 10
1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4448
62 N.Y.2d 924
467 N.E.2d 894

Cited by

Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Photocircuits Corp.
New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 2003
Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. J.D.G.S. Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Aug 13, 1998
Insurance Co. of Greater New York v. Glen Haven Residential Health Care Facility Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Aug 13, 1998
Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Gem Steel Erectors Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Mar 27, 1997
Gordon v. Goldman Bros.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · May 4, 1987
Illumalights Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neo-Ray Products, Inc.