Opinion

County of Onondaga v. Penetryn Systems Inc.

451 N.Y.S.2d 738 · New York Court of Appeals · May 11, 1982

Full text

County of Onondaga, Respondent, v. Penetryn Systems, Inc., Et Al., Appellants

*729 OPINION OF THE COURT On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (84 AD2d 934). Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 2583816

Citations

451 N.Y.S.2d 738
1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3382
56 N.Y.2d 726
436 N.E.2d 1340

Cited by

Croteau v. A.C. & S.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 26, 2007
County of Orange v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 22, 1996
Brown v. Two Exchange Plaza Partners
New York Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1990
Tedesco v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jul 7, 1988
Magrath v. J. Migliore Construction Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 8, 1988
Roy W. Helm, III v. Western Maryland Railway Company, a Body Corporate v. The County Commissioners of Carroll County, Third Party