Opinion

MATTER OF CITY OF SYRACUSE v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment

64 N.Y.2d 894 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1985

Full text

In the Matter of the City of Syracuse Et Al., Appellants, v. State Board of Equalization and Assessment, Respondent

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs. We affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (101 AD2d 653) and agree with that court that the method used in calculating the equalization rate was rational and the rate fixed was supported by substantial evidence. Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 2590603

Citations

64 N.Y.2d 894

Cited by

Town of Riverhead v. New York State Board of Real Property Services
New York Supreme Court · Jul 9, 2003
Matter of Town of Riverhead v. New York State Bd. of Real Prop. Servs.
New York Supreme Court, Albany County · Jul 9, 2003
Town of Marbletown v. New York State Board of Real Property Services
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 19, 2003
Town of Cortlandt v. New York State Board of Real Property Services
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Nov 19, 2001
Town of Greenburgh v. New York State Board of Real Property Services
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Sep 25, 2000
Town of Pleasant Valley v. New York State Board of Real Property Services