Full text
In the Matter of the Claim of William Nallan, Jr., Respondent, v. Motion Picture Studio Mechanics Union, Local No. 52, Et Al., Appellants, and Nallan Associates, Inc., Et Al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent

Loading…
Opinion
40 N.Y.2d 1042 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1976
Full text
In the Matter of the Claim of William Nallan, Jr., Respondent, v. Motion Picture Studio Mechanics Union, Local No. 52, Et Al., Appellants, and Nallan Associates, Inc., Et Al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 9, 2016
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 2008
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Jun 18, 2007
Supreme Court of Alabama · May 22, 1998
Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1997
Colorado Court of Appeals · May 16, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · May 31, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Nov 4, 1993
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jul 1, 1993
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 24, 1993
Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1993
Parentheticals
emphasizing, in the context of whether a board member of a labor union was an employee of the union, that the board member’s stipend did not constitute a salary or compensation under workers’ compensation laws
paraplegic claimant not entitled to a new, specially equipped automobile for travel to and from work
a specially-equipped automobile held not to be a "medical apparatus or device"
a specially-equipped automobile held not to be a “medical apparatus or device”
van not a "medical apparatus or device" under New York statute
same, applied to a paraplegic