Commonwealth v. Baynton

4 U.S. 282 (____) 4 Dall. 282 The Commonwealth versus Baynton et al. Supreme Court of United States. *283 M`Kean, (attorney-general) and Dallas for the commonwealth. Rawle, for the defendants. The COURT, in the charge, directed the jury, in point of law, to confine the responsibility of the sureties, to a deficit occurring during the year, ensuing the date of the bond. But if, from the evidence, they were satisfied, that there was a deficit, during that year, they thought, that a verdict should be in favour of the commonwealth for the amount. Verdict for the defendants.[(1)] NOTES [(1)] It may be proper to observe, that Mr. Baynton did not appear, nor take defence, in this suit: the proceedings to recover from him having been instituted on the settlement of the comptroller.