State v. Saunders

Parentheticals

• concluding that confronting the defendant with incriminating evidence, without using the evidence coercively, did not create compelling circumstances

  State v. Machain

• circumstances not compelling where the police interviewed the defendant in his own home and confronted him with incriminating evidence in a noncoercive manner

  State v. Mattheisen

• where the defendant’s statements were not made under compelling circumstances, any error in admitting that evidence was harmless in light of the defendant’s own trial testimony

  State v. Moore

• defense counsel's statement that he could not "think of a better way" to instruct the jury invited any error pertaining to the trial court's subsequent jury instruction

  State v. J. J. S. (In re J. J. S.)

• circumstances not compelling when confronting the defendant with incriminating evidence in noncoercive manner

  State v. Heise-Fay

• one and one-half hour interview in defendant's home did not constitute compelling circumstances

  State v. Grimm