Loading…

Man Aktiengesellschaft v. Daimlerchrysler Ag — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Man Aktiengesellschaft v. Daimlerchrysler Ag

345 Or. 94 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 2, 2008

Full text

Man Aktiengesellschaft v. Daimlerchrysler Ag

189 P.3d 749 (2008) 345 Or. 94 MAN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG. No. (S055864). Supreme Court of Oregon. July 2, 2008. Petition for review allowed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 2628223

Citations

345 Or. 94
2008 Ore. LEXIS 579
189 P.3d 749

Cited by

Patton v. Target Corp.
Ninth Circuit · Sep 2, 2009
James Patton v. Target Corporation
Ninth Circuit · Sep 2, 2009
Funkhouser v. WELLS FARGO CORP.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 3, 2008

Parentheticals

interest was vested because it was not contingent
Funkhouser v. WELLS FARGO CORP.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service