T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. Willie Wilson, and P. J. Donovan, Deputy Commissioner

*314 PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment for plaintiff for the reasons for judgment set out in the district judge’s opinion. 1 Of the clear opinion that the district judge’s order should be affirmed, for the reasons that he gave, we approve his opinion and affirm his judgment. 2 Affirmed. Footnotes [1] Wilson v. Donovan, Deputy Commissioner, etc., D.C., 218 F.Supp. 944. [2] See 15 Am.Jur. 387, See. 2; Restatement of the Law of Contracts, p. 498, Sec. 326; Aetna Cas. & Ins. Co. v. Jordan, 234 Ark. 339, 352 S.W.2d 75; Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. De Bruin, 271 Wis. 412, 73 N.W.2d 479; Hagenah v. Lumbermen’s Mut. Cas. Co., 241 Wis. 226, 5 N.W.2d 760, 142 A.L.R. 1417; Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. et al. v. City of Marshall, 136 U.S. 393, 10 S.Ct. 846, 34 L.Ed. 385; Miller v. Weller, 3 Cir., 288 F.2d 438; Scott v. Donald, 165 U.S. 58, 17 S.Ct. 265, 41 L.Ed. 632; Paterson v. Sears-Roebuck & Co., 196 F.2d 947.