State v. Canosa

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0001051 17-JUN-2014 01:44 PM SCWC-11-0001051 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. STANLEY CANOSA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0001051; CR. NO. 09-1-1524) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Stanley Canosa’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on May 6, 2014, is hereby rejected.1 DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 17, 2014. Emmanuel V. Tipon /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Sonja P. McCullen for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson [1] Upon retrial, the trial court may consider the appropriateness of an “inference” instruction. See State v. Steger, 114 Hawai'i 162 , 171 n.18, 158 P.3d 280 , 289 n.18 (2006); State v. Matafeo, 71 Haw. 183, 189 , 787 P.2d 671, 674 (1990) (Wakatsuki, J., concurring); Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 59-60 (1988) (Stevens, J., concurring).