Johnson (Michael) v. State

recommended by the Division of Parole and Probation, we conclude that his claim is without merit because a district court does not abuse its discretion by imposing a sentence in excess of that suggested by the Division. See Collins v. State, 88 Nev. 168, 171, 494 P.2d 956, 957 (1972). Having concluded that Johnson is not entitled to relief, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

et Asktik_ 9, J. Parraguirre Saitta

cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge Nguyen & Lay Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A e