Ingebretsen (John) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2014

Full text

34.724, he was not eligible for post-conviction habeas relief.' See id. For this reason, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Pickering

Saitta

cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge Federal Public Defender/Las Vegas Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

lIngebretsen argues that he satisfied the imprisonment requirement because, at the time that he filed the petition, he had been arrested and released on bail for a charge of violating the conditions of lifetime supervision. A violation of lifetime supervision, however, is a separate offense and does not alter the fact that Ingebretsen was no longer under sentence of imprisonment in district court case number C175709 when he filed the petition. See Jackson v. State, 115 Nev. 21, 23, 973 P.2d 241, 242 (1999); Coleman, 130 Nev. at , 321 P.3d at 865-67.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) I947A •AIS,4

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Unpublished
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 2714417

Citations

No parsed citations returned.

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service