Putnam Leasing Co. I, LLC v. Moran

elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections."), and we therefore affirm the district court's decision to set aside the New York judgment.' Rosenstein v. Steele, 103 Nev. 571, 573, 747 P.2d 230, 231 (1987) (explaining that a lack of due process is an appropriate basis to set aside a foreign judgment under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution). It is so ORDERED.

j. Parraguirre Cherry

'Although the district court's finding that appellant had failed to make a good-faith effort to work out a payment arrangement with respondent before commencing the New York action was not a proper basis for setting aside the judgment, see Rosenstein u. Steele, 103 Nev. 571, 573, 747 P.2d 230, 231 (1987) (explaining that, under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution, the courts of this state may not set aside a final judgment of a sister state "absent a showing of fraud, lack of due process or lack of jurisdiction in the rendering state"), we may affirm the judgment of the district court if it reached the right result, even if it did so for the wrong reason. See Sengel v. IGT, 116 Nev. 565, 570, 2 P.3d 258, 261 (2000).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (CD 1947A e

cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge Salvatore C. Gugino, Settlement Judge The Bach Law Firm Gordon & Rees, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (01 1947A 9rfgrk,