Jackson (Anthony) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court · Apr 10, 2014

Full text

957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion at sentencing, and we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 1

Saitta

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Footnotes

[1] Thefast track statement submitted by Jackson fails to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure because the fact section does not contain any citations to the record. See NRAP 3C(e)(1)(C); NRAP 28(e)(1). Counsel for Jackson is cautioned that the failure to comply with the briefing requirements in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n); Smith v. Emery, 109 Nev. 737, 743, 856 P.2d 1386, 1390 (1993). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 A-A 1947A

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Unpublished
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 2714867

Citations

No parsed citations returned.

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service