Alvin Jean v. State

PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Alvin Jean’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We write to comment solely on appellant’s claim that his fifteen-year sentences are illegal having been imposed following revocation of his youthful offender probationary terms. Through several recent opinions, this court has rejected that challenge and explained its reasoning when concluding that comparable terms are legal. See Mosley v. State, 134 So.3d 1124 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Lachenauer v. State, 117 So.3d 880 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Eustache v. State, 83 So.3d 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Affirmed. CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ„ concur.