Abdelaziz Hamze v. State

. PER CURIAM. Appellant seeks review of an order that denied his rule 3.850 motion. The trial court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion in light of appellant’s pending appeal of a prior rule 3.850 motion. We reverse and remand for the trial court to consider this court’s opinions in Marshall v. State, 91 So.3d 277 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), Jackman v. State, 88 So.3d 325 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), and Lubin v. State, 87 So.3d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); see also Sydoriak v. State, 92 So.3d 298 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). As in those cases, we express no opinion on the merits of appellant’s, motion. Reversed and Remanded. WARNER, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.