J. Howard Arnold v. William J. McGuiness

PER CURIAM: We have carefully considered appellant’s assignments of error and they have no merit. We agree with and adopt the decision of the district court. 1 We also reaffirm this Court’s prior decisions, wherein J. Howard Arnold was twice before this Court as the appellant. 2 Affirmed. Footnotes [1] See Memorandum and Order filed February 2, 1967, Arnold v. McGuiness, U.S. D.O. N.D.Calif., 289 F.Supp. 210. [2] See Arnold v. Bostick, 9 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 879, cert. den. 382 U.S. 858, 86 S. Ct. 113, 15 L.Ed.2d 96; unreported Order in Arnold v. McGuiness, 9 Cir., 1966, No. 20617, cert. den. 386 U.S. 996, 87 S.Ct. 1315, 18 D.Ed.2d 343.