Full text
David KNELLER, Petitioner v. Marsha C. STEWART, Respondent
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2015, as Petitioner may pursue redress in a civil action, mandamus relief is not available. See Relosky v. Sacco, 514 Pa. 339, 523 A.2d 1112 (1987) (holding that a petitioner may not obtain mandamus relief unless he establishes the absence of another adequate reme *174 dy). As such, the Petition for Review in the Nature of Mandamus is DENIED, and the Application to Disqualify Counsel is DISMISSED as moot.
